Friday, August 16, 2013

Video Presentation version 3.0 BPIOD (Best Practices in Online Discussions) by Devonee Trivett

Video Presentation
version 3.0 BPIOD
(Best Practices in Online Discussions) by Devonee Trivett




Credits:

Written, Filmed and Produced by Devonee Trivett
on location in Portland, Oregon and Newport Oregon

Audio Credits:
Narration written and spoken by Devonee Trivett
Background music “Kalimba,” provided by Mr. Scruff


Actors:

Linda Curtice

Amador Gutierrez

Erica Redman

Devonee Trivett  08/05/2013 Educ 7102 Principles of Distance Education (pt. I: Annotated Bibliography, II.Narrator, & III: and Audio Credits)


You can also visit Devonee’s blog to view the presentation and comments.
Video Presentation: Best Practices in an Online Discussion Forum
I. Annotated Bibliography
Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.
A collection of articles by instructors and scholars actively working in the field of distance education, this collection addresses the core issues and concerns in distance education online.
Beaudoin, M. (1990). The instructor’s changing role in distance education..The American Journal of Distance Education, 4
(2), 21–29.
This source predicted increases in student demand for distance and online learning, and that the sufficient impact on the role of instructors as a consequence of this will require a shift in definition of roles. The writer postulates that student- centeredness is at the very core of distance learning, and that the focus should be on what the learner does and not what the instructor does in an online classroom. Instructor roles in the online classroom are rooted in facilitating and supporting learning.
The author calls for an increased support for participants as a main factor in successful transition into these new roles that are required in distance learning today.
Bourne, J., & Moore, J. C., (2005). Introduction. In Bourne, J., & Moore, J. C., (Eds.),
Elements of quality online education: Vol. 6. Engaging communities (pp. 7–10). The Sloan Consortium.
Most people now understand that online learning is the new distance learning, and there is also increased understanding that online learning is superior in some ways to FSF learning. Education is a business, and the one effective practice in business is networking. This means engaging members within and across organizations. Engaging learners in learning communities will bring new life to education.

Cox, B. & Cox, B. (2008). Developing interpersonal and group dynamics through asynchronous threaded discussions: The use of discussion board incollaborative learning.Education, 4: 553-565.
Cox and Cox (2008) present evidence to support the conclusion that an asynchronous discussion space for student interaction develops a community of learners. Designing discussions with increased collaboration opportunities was also a factor found to contribute to educational value in online student experiences.
Jarosewich, T., Vargo, L., Salzman, J., Lenhart, L., Krosnick, L., Vance, K., & Roskos, K. (2010). Say What? The Quality of Discussion Board Postings in Online Professional Development. New      Horizons In Education, 58(3), 118-132
These researchers determined that a foundation of constructivist learning experiences included in the larger course design is a best practice when setting the foundation for relevant and intellectually stimulating discussion posts that maximize student engagement (Jarosewich,et al).
Johnson, G., Hsieh, P., & Kidwai, K. (2007). Perceived Value and Persistence of Web Publishing Skills: Implications for e-Portfolio Systems.International Journal On E-Learning, 6(3), 379-394
In this study the researchers discovered that online learning programs designed for increased personal control of student  learning space, and the web publishing skills required in order to do this, are valued by students. The purpose of the study was to explore the extent to which students value these skills, and to which these skills are sustained. The skills were determined to be sustained when web publishing opportunities were included in the course.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating online: Learning together in community. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
This text introduces key elements in establishing social presence and a learning community online. The authors make suggestions for increasing both student participation and collaboration opportunities in order to improve the learning process.

Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-BassSimon, D., Jackson, K., & Maxwell, K. (2013). TRADITIONAL VERSUS ONLINE INSTRUCTION: FACULTY RESOURCES IMPACT STRATEGIES FOR COURSE DELIVERY. Business Education & Accreditation5(1), 107-116.
The use of discussions online increases the feelings of connectedness among students when the six elements named as honesty, responsiveness, relevance, respect, openness and empowerment are infused within the course curriculum.
Students in this case study undergraduate online students were not satisfied with the learning process because they did not perceive a high level of teacher presence, despite successful learning outcomes. Therefore, in order to obtain satisfaction levels, a strong teacher presence is indicated.
Shea, P., Li, C. S., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2005, December). Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(4). Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/jaln/v9n4/developing-learning-community-online-asynchronous-college-courses-role-teaching-presence
These authors present a multi-institutional case study across thirty-two colleges. Their findings upon analysis of the learning environments were that there is an important relationship between a teacher presence and the development of an online learning community, and that there is a need for greater training in effective ways to establish teaching presence. They make specific recommendations for teacher interaction that supports social presence through focusing discussions and supporting students. Because learning is essentially social in nature, they argue adoption of online learning environments designed with social learning theory as a foundation, paired with teachers who effectively participate in online discussion and thus increase social presence, will improve the learning experience.
Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3). Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/jaln/v9n3/nature-and-development-social-presence-online-course-discussions
Social presence resulted in higher student satisfaction with online discussions in this case study. Social presence, defined as the degree to which students in an online course experience a feeling of connection with one another, was determined to be an important factor in student satisfaction and success in online courses. Course design and perceived teacher presence were both factors named to correlate with higher levels of social presence.
Wiley, D. (2007). Online self-organizing social systems. In Luppicini, R. Online learning communities:   Communities in distance education (pp. 289–291). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Online self-organizing social systems exhibit unique qualities so far not existent in the current popular mode of learning facilitation.  The key obstacle is the complexity of instruction, intervention and teacher presence and whether instructors can adjust to the changing role or not. Because this mode of learning is complimentary to problem-based learning, a foundation for quality online educational design, social systems online have a place in the future of DE.

Narrator Notes: Best Practices for Discussions in an Online Environment by
-Devonee Trivett (07/31/2013)
Clip 1. As a moderator or as a participant in an online forum, following some general
guidelines will creating the best learning experience for everyone . The goal is to
maximize relevant and thought-provoking responses from all participants in the
discussion. This is done through creating a reflective learning environment (Pallof & Pratt, 2007).
Clip 2. One: Be clear about your expectations . Set specific ground rules. Set standards
for communication such as basic online etiquette, correct grammar and spelling, and number of words per post. Insist on professional and respectful dialogue, and provide students with specific rubrics that explain your assessment process ahead of time. Require inclusion of differing viewpoints. Design and provide a discussion post rubric for participants (Pallof & Pratt).
Clip 3. Two: Cultivate a strong teacher presence. Be direct and clear, and respond to student inquiries on a timely basis. Also don’t be afraid to share your own opinions and be sure to encourage information sharing among students (Joo, Joung, Kim, & Chung, 2012).


Clip 4: three: Differentiate: Online Discussions offer a prime opportunity for asynchronous learning and for heightened collaboration among reflective learners. Collaboration can be encouraged through a variety of team activities, and through rewarding constructive feedback with points. Provide opportunities for asynchronous and synchronous learners. Students require different modes of instruction and learning. Differentiate instruction for asynchronous and synchronous learners. In asynchronous discussion, students can stop and start as they please, allowing them to learn, research, respond and participate at their own pace. (Swan, & Shih, 2005).
Clip 4.   Model respect. Invite differing viewpoints and in-depth discussion that is respectful. Do this through offering positive reinforcement to all learners. Promote an open, supportive, and
respectful online discussion, provide a space where students post their questions and answers. Listen, Reflect and Respond to views expressed . (Durrington, Berryhill & Swafford, n.d., p.191), all contributions have educational value, and opportunity for reflecting on another point of view. Set and keep deadlines. Respond in a timely manner. Require inclusion of differing viewpoints, and invite differing viewpoints through critical thinking exercises.


Clip 5. Tip 5: Encourage information sharing and collaboration. When students reflect on and revisit ideas in a learning loop, as described in here, the result is an online experience that  has been called "Transformative Learning." (Pallof . & Pratt)

Clip 6. Tip 6: Build Trust. Be authentic. Social presence is important for learners, and
being authentic is one way to encourage others to share personal anecdotes that build connections. When building an online community of learners it will be important to develop a social presence (Swan,& Shih, 2005), and the instructor can encourage authenticity through sharing his or her own experiences throughout the course dialogue.
Clip 7. Tip 6: Design Structured Controversies (Jacobs, 2010); and time to research, reflect, discuss and revisit about problems in a “learning loop.”The learners need the time and the opportunity to engage in reflective and explorative work that is “inspired by discussions” (Pallof & Pratt, 2007, pp. 185-187).. With discussions that are focused, learning can be both meaningful and helpful to professional growth (Chitanana, 2012). This happens when there is time specified for reading, for developing posts that are reflective and informed with recent research, and responding to these posts online. Instructors can designing space for the transformation process when dilemnas and space for independent learning is built into the learning plan.
    A particularly unique process of transformation in an online learning environment can take place when students engage in this cultivated, reflective online community (Pallof & Pratt, 2007, pp. 185-187).
    In review, the seven best practices in an online discussion are: 1.Be clear about expectations. 2. Cultivate a strong teacher presence.3. Differentiate for asynchronous and synchronous learners. 4. Model respect. 5. Provide opportunities for collaboration.6: Build Trust. Be authentic. 7: Design Structured Controversies

With all of these elements incorporated throughout an online discussion forum, discussions can be both meaningful academically and helpful to professional development.

Clip 8. Creating reflective online discussions and the subsequent growth and learning is much like cultivating a garden. Each require regular care and tending, ….and everyone will likely run into into some snags along the way, but with perseverance and vigilance,…. the result will be a lively, robust, growing learning environment for all involved.
II. Image Credits:
IMAGE OF PALLOF & PRATT  Courtesy of
III. Narrator Notes: Best Practices for Discussions in an Online Environment by
-Devonee Trivett (07/31/2013)
Clip 1. As a moderator or as a participant in an online forum, following some general
guidelines will creating the best learning experience for everyone . The goal is to
maximize relevant and thought-provoking responses from all participants in the
discussion. This is done through creating a reflective learning environment (Pallof & Pratt, 2007).
Clip 2. One: Be clear about your expectations . Set specific ground rules. Set standards
for communication such as basic online etiquette, correct grammar and spelling, and number of words per post. Insist on professional and respectful dialogue, and provide students with specific rubrics that explain your assessment process ahead of time. Require inclusion of differing viewpoints. Design and provide a discussion post rubric for participants (Pallof & Pratt).
Clip 3. Two: Cultivate a strong teacher presence. Be direct and clear, and respond to student inquiries on a timely basis. Also don’t be afraid to share your own opinions and be sure to encourage information sharing among students (Joo, Joung, Kim, & Chung, 2012).


Clip 4: three: Differentiate: Online Discussions offer a prime opportunity for asynchronous learning and for heightened collaboration among reflective learners. Collaboration can be encouraged through a variety of team activities, and through rewarding constructive feedback with points. Provide opportunities for asynchronous and synchronous learners. Students require different modes of instruction and learning. Differentiate instruction for asynchronous and synchronous learners. In asynchronous discussion, students can stop and start as they please, allowing them to learn, research, respond and participate at their own pace. (Swan, & Shih, 2005).
Clip 4.   Model respect. Invite differing viewpoints and in-depth discussion that is respectful. Do this through offering positive reinforcement to all learners. Promote an open, supportive, and
respectful online discussion, provide a space where students post their questions and answers. Listen, Reflect and Respond to views expressed . (Durrington, Berryhill & Swafford, n.d., p.191), all contributions have educational value, and opportunity for reflecting on another point of view. Set and keep deadlines. Respond in a timely manner. Require inclusion of differing viewpoints, and invite differing viewpoints through critical thinking exercises.


Clip 5. Tip 5: Encourage information sharing and collaboration. When students reflect on and revisit ideas in a learning loop, as described in here, the result is an online experience that  has been called "Transformative Learning." (Pallof . & Pratt)

Clip 6. Tip 6: Build Trust. Be authentic. Social presence is important for learners, and
being authentic is one way to encourage others to share personal anecdotes that build connections. When building an online community of learners it will be important to develop a social presence (Swan,& Shih, 2005), and the instructor can encourage authenticity through sharing his or her own experiences throughout the course dialogue.
Clip 7. Tip 6: Design Structured Controversies (Jacobs, 2010); and time to research, reflect, discuss and revisit about problems in a “learning loop.”The learners need the time and the opportunity to engage in reflective and explorative work that is “inspired by discussions” (Pallof & Pratt, 2007, pp. 185-187).. With discussions that are focused, learning can be both meaningful and helpful to professional growth (Chitanana, 2012). This happens when there is time specified for reading, for developing posts that are reflective and informed with recent research, and responding to these posts online. Instructors can designing space for the transformation process when dilemnas and space for independent learning is built into the learning plan.
    A particularly unique process of transformation in an online learning environment can take place when students engage in this cultivated, reflective online community (Pallof & Pratt, 2007, pp. 185-187).
    In review, the seven best practices in an online discussion are: 1.Be clear about expectations. 2. Cultivate a strong teacher presence.3. Differentiate for asynchronous and synchronous learners. 4. Model respect. 5. Provide opportunities for collaboration.6: Build Trust. Be authentic. 7: Design Structured Controversies

With all of these elements incorporated throughout an online discussion forum, discussions can be both meaningful academically and helpful to professional development.

Clip 8. Creating reflective online discussions and the subsequent growth and learning is much like cultivating a garden. Each require regular care and tending, ….and everyone will likely run into into some snags along the way, but with perseverance and vigilance,…. the result will be a lively, robust, growing learning environment for all involved.

Thursday, August 15, 2013

Image Credits:
Filmed on location by Devonee Trivett
IMAGE OF PALLOF & PRATT  Courtesy of
Texas Professional Development @ 
http://www.txprofdev.org/apps/onlineteaching/intro/keith_rena.jpg
Audio Credits:
Narration by Devonee Trivett
Background Music Courtesy of Mr. Scruff, Kalimba



Friday, August 9, 2013

Shortened Version of Final Video Presentation for Principles of Distance Ed, EDUC 7102


Devonee Trivett  08/05/2013 Educ 7102 Principles of Distance Education 

Image Credits:

Filmed by Devonee Trivett on Location

IMAGE OF PALLOF & PRATT  Courtesy of http://www.google.com and http://www.txprofdev.org/apps/onlineteaching

Audio Credits:

Narrated by Devonee Trivett on Location

Background music: Kalimba by Mr. Scruff

Bibliography
Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.

Beaudoin, M. (1990). The instructor’s changing role in distance education..The American Journal of Distance Education, 4
(2), 21–29.

Bourne, J., & Moore, J. C., (2005). Introduction. In Bourne, J., & Moore, J. C., (Eds.)


Cox, B. & Cox, B. (2008). Developing interpersonal and group dynamics through asynchronous threaded discussions: The use of discussion board incollaborative learning.Education, 4: 553-565.

Jarosewich, T., Vargo, L., Salzman, J., Lenhart, L., Krosnick, L., Vance, K., & Roskos, K. (2010). Say What? The Quality of Discussion Board Postings in Online Professional Development. New      Horizons In Education, 58(3), 118-132

Johnson, G., Hsieh, P., & Kidwai, K. (2007). Perceived Value and Persistence of Web Publishing Skills: Implications for e-Portfolio Systems.International Journal On E-Learning, 6(3), 379-394

Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating online: Learning together in community. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.


Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-BassSimon, D., Jackson, K., & Maxwell, K. (2013). TRADITIONAL VERSUS ONLINE INSTRUCTION: FACULTY RESOURCES IMPACT STRATEGIES FOR COURSE DELIVERY. Business Education & Accreditation5(1), 107-116.

Shea, P., Li, C. S., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2005, December). Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(4). Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/jaln/v9n4/developing-learning-community-online-asynchronous-college-courses-role-teaching-presence

Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3). Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/jaln/v9n3/nature-and-development-social-presence-online-course-discussions
.
Wiley, D. (2007). Online self-organizing social systems. In Luppicini, R. Online learning communities:   Communities in distance education (pp. 289–291). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing

Saturday, August 3, 2013

Youtube Presentation of Video for DE


Best Practices for Discussions in an Online Forum by D. Trivett 
Best Practices Video link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4SeEVJLU7Y 
References
Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning [electronic resource] / edited by Terry Anderson. Edmonton : AU Press, c2008.
Chitanana, L. (2012). A Constructivist Approach to the Design and Delivery of an Online Professional Development Course: A Case of the iEARN Online Course. Online Submission
Durrington, V. A., Berryhill, A., & Swafford, J. (2006). Strategies for enhancing student interactivity in an online environmentCollege Teaching, 54(1), 190−193.
Jacobs, G. M. (2010). The Academic Controversy Technique: Towards Cooperative Debates. Online Submission.
Joo, Y., Joung, S., Kim, N., & Chung, H. (2012). Factors Impacting Corporate E-Learners' Learning Flow, Satisfaction, and Learning Persistence. International Association for Development Of The Information Society,
Moller, L., Huett, J., Holder, D., Young, J., Harvey, D., & Godshalk, V. (2005). Examining the impact of learning communities on motivation. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(2), 137−143
References Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning [electronic resource] / edited by Terry Anderson. Edmonton : AU Press, c2008. Chitanana, L. (2012). A Constructivist Approach to the Design and Delivery of an Online Professional Development Course: A Case of the iEARN Online Course. Online Submission Durrington, V. A., Berryhill, A., & Swafford, J. (2006). Strategies for enhancing student interactivity in an online environment. College Teaching, 54(1), 190−193. Jacobs, G. M. (2010). The Academic Controversy Technique: Towards Cooperative Debates. Online Submission. Joo, Y., Joung, S., Kim, N., & Chung, H. (2012). Factors Impacting Corporate E-Learners' Learning Flow, Satisfaction, and Learning Persistence. International Association for Development Of The Information Society, Moller, L., Huett, J., Holder, D., Young, J., Harvey, D., & Godshalk, V. (2005). Examining the impact of learning communities on motivation. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(2), 137−143 Pallof, R. & Pratt, K., (2007). Building Online Learning Communities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating Online: Learning Together in Community. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Seaman, J., & Association of Public and Land-grant, U. (2009). Online Learning as a Strategic Asset. Volume II: The Paradox of Faculty Voices--Views and Experiences with Online Learning. Results of a National Faculty Survey, Part of the Online Education Benchmarking Study Conducted by the APLU-Sloan National Commission on Online Learning. Association Of Public And Land-Grant Universities. Sieman, G. (2008) Learning and Knowing in Networks. Changing Roles for Educators and Designers, ITFORUM. Silvers, P., O'Connell, J., & Fewell, M. (2007). Strategies for Creating Community in a Graduate Education Online Program. Journal Of Computing In Teacher Education, 23(3), 81-87. Pallof,  R. & Pratt, K., (2007). Building Online Learning Communities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating Online: Learning Together in Community. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Seaman, J., & Association of Public and Land-grant, U. (2009). Online Learning as a Strategic Asset. Volume II: The Paradox of Faculty Voices--Views and Experiences with Online Learning.   Results of a National Faculty Survey, Part of the Online Education Benchmarking Study             Conducted by the APLU-Sloan National Commission on Online Learning. Association Of       Public And Land-Grant Universities.
Sieman, G. (2008) Learning and Knowing in Networks. Changing Roles for Educators and Designers,             ITFORUM.

Silvers, P., O'Connell, J., & Fewell, M. (2007). Strategies for Creating Community in a Graduate    Education Online Program. Journal Of Computing In Teacher Education, 23(3), 81-87.

Video: Best Practices in an Online Discussion Forum 08/03/2013 EDUC 7102 /Princ. of DE



Video: Best Practices in an Online Discussion Forum 08/03/2013 EDUC 7102 /Princ. of DE



Tuesday, July 30, 2013

My Video Making Process

  Hi Everyone! If you are like me, you were very nervous about this process of creating a video for the final presentation. I couldn't find my video editing software on my computer (I have Windows 7), but I decided to sit down and figure out what Dr. Moller was talking about when he said, " every pc and mac comes with free video editing software, it is foolish to purchase editing software." I wasn't able to find the video editing software on my computer, and i did a general search on my start bar through all my programs for "Microsoft Video Editing Software." It turns out that Microsoft can download their Movie Maker software if you have Windows and a connection to the Internet. So I did this, and now I have the bare bones of my presentation started! It's really actually very easy and fun to make the video with Windows 7 Movie Maker. Do a Google search of 'Windows Movie Maker' if you need to download software. It's free.

I also cut down on editing time because I used my storyboard when filming the video. I took the subject of each window in the storyboard, handed that title to my friends who played as students, and filmed the clip for the amount of time that I planned on my storyboard. That way I had very little clipping to do today and just have to paste the seperate parts together, then I added captions to each video clip that related to the storyboard. Now I have to edit it for spelling and content, finish my Annotated Bibliography, finalize my speaker notes, and narrate the video. 

Hope that sharing my process with you all helps! Let me know about your process! -Devonee

Monday, July 29, 2013

Here is an updated version of the graphic organizer I posted at the "VIEW GRAPHIC ORGANIZER" link on July 23, 2012.

Click ON LINK BELOW to VIEW EDUC 7102 GRAPHIC ORGANIZER

http://www.gliffy.com/go/publish/image/4775227/L.png.

This link should be easier to locate on my page. 

Please check out my detailed description of this on my July 23 posting, and let me know if you have any comment or suggestions. Thanks! -Devonee


click here to email me any suggestions or comments

Friday, July 26, 2013




Benefits of Distance Education in an Online Environment

Devonee Trivett, July 26, 2014

1.  Education online is economically viable for both institutions and students.   (Laureate, 2008a).
2. Virtual learning allows a student to practice what he or she is learning in a safe environment.
3. Educational technology allows instructors to provide custom-fit differentiated instruction because they have the time to reflect before providing individual learning activities, feedback and assessments (Huett, Moller, Foshay, & Coleman, 2008).
4. Learners can easily share information with one another, making for a community of interactive and collaborating learners (Huett, Moller, Foshay, & Coleman).
5. Both teachers and students have greater levels of flexibility with an online environment, disolving the geographic and time barriers to education that some have experienced in the past (Laureate).
6. Working from home has obvious benefits to both the instructor and the student. 
7. Distance is no longer a barrier to learning (Laureate).
References
Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W. & Coleman, C. (2008, September/October). The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the Web (Part 3: K12). TechTrends, 52(5), 63–67.
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2008a). Equivalency Theory. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008, July/August). The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the Web (Part 2: Higher Education). TechTrends, 52(4), 66–70.


WebRep
currentVote
noRating
noWeight

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Graphic Organizer of Student Engagement Tools

View Graphic Organizer


In choosing tools for student learning, it is important for teachers to choose tools that ask the learner to participate with maximum engagement. Static tools allow for minimal levels of participation and creativity on the part of the student. Dynamic tools encourage and require participation, collaboration, communication and creativity (Moller, 2008). Dynamic technologies also allow for both students and teachers to collaboratively participate in knowledge building using a blended curriculum of learning modes, and among a community of professionals which is a highly effective learning method (Wenger, 2005).


References


Moller, L. (2008). Static and dynamic technological tools

Wenger, E., White, N., Smith, J. D., & Rowe, K. (2005, .January 18). Creating communities of practice. In 

     Technology for Communities

online forums that best encourage student engagement

In researching practices in online forums that best encourage student engagement, I found that encouraging students to publish regularly on the web is a practice that inspires engagement that last could las after the course has ended. If we develop this habit, and practice this habit even after the course has ended, it is in one way of making learning more authentic and relevant  because it becomes a part of our life and habits. When we as students and educators post to a blog, and then go on to develop this habit and return to the blog to post more reflections and thoughts later, is a skill for greater engagement, life-long learning, and greater possibilities of collaboration (Johnson,Hsieh, & Kidwai, 2007).

So here is to hearing from my fellow Walden students more now and in the future! -Devonee Trivett
So 
Reference

Johnson, G., Hsieh, P., & Kidwai, K. (2007). Perceived Value and Persistence of Web Publishing Skills: Implications for e-Portfolio Systems.International Journal On E-Learning, 6(3), 379-394.